THE CHANCELLOR was wrong to row back on plans to impose a ‘mansion tax' on expensive properties, according to our online audience.
Of the 123 polled, little more than a quarter – 28% – agreed with the move, amid concerns that asset-rich, cash-poor people could be caught by its introduction. The remaining 72% disagreed with abandoning the measure, noting its potential for tackling tax avoidance issues.
The ‘mansion tax' – originally proposed by Vince Cable – would have seen a rate of 1% or 2% of the property's value above a threshold of £1m to 2m, but both David Cameron and George Osborne ruled out its introduction.
In ruling out the tax at the Conservative party conference, Osborne said he was concerned the policy "will be sold to you as a mansion tax" before the election, and then afterwards, "a lot of the people in Britain are going to wake up and find their more modest homes have suddenly been reclassified as a mansion".
Vote in Accountancy Age's latest poll:
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.