THE PENSIONS REGULATOR has softened its approach to companies that cut back on contributions.
In an interview with Accountancy Age's sister publication Professional Pensions, TPR chief executive Bill Galvin (pictured) adopted a more lenient attitude to companies finding it difficult to finance their schemes.
Galvin said: “In our April statement, [we said] we should start from the premise that you should at least maintain the contributions you are making into the scheme.
“But if an employer is struggling and may be moving towards insolvency, decreasing contributions is one way of managing that.
“If the trustees genuinely believe that is the only way for the scheme sponsor to survive, they may well agree to that.”
Trinity Mirror finance director Vijay Vaghela said it was “confusing” that TPR had not responded to his letter in March because “there was a lot of speculation that TPR would be unhappy”.
Galvin also took a more relaxed approach to scheme data requirements, accepting small schemes will not make the targets.
TPR set a high standard for data quality two years ago, demanding by December 2012 schemes have 100% of common data present for all records created after June 2010. Scheme records pre-dating this need to have 95% of common data present.
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.