Big Four audit tenders benefit from ‘virtuous circle’

by Richard Crump

More from this author

01 Oct 2012

  • Comments
Big Four

A "VIRTUOUS CIRCLE" that exists for the Big Four is hindering the mid-tier's ability to win FTSE 350 audits, according to the Competition Commission.

The commission, which is investigating competition issues in the market for large-listed audits, found that the Big Four's ability to point to an extensive international network and audit engagement partners with relevant experience increases their chances of successfully tendering business.

In a working paper outlining an overview of its findings, the commission found that the "circle operates in reverse" for mid-tier firms, and that there is a "risk of prejudice" against non-Big-Four firms from companies which mid-tier firms have the capability to audit.

"Some of [the mid-tier] equally have extensive international networks (albeit with smaller member firms), but cannot point to the same level of experience of auditing large companies," it said.

FTSE 350 decision-makers tend not to be concerned about price when determining audit provision, as such fees tend not to represent a large proportion of their overall budgets. The commission also found evidence of a perception that price and quality are linked – therefore undermining one route for mid-tier firms to win work – namely low cost provision.

"Equally, management aversion to shared audits means that mid-tier firms cannot demonstrate their capability by initially auditing say, one subsidiary or territory," the commission said.

Having heard views from companies, investors and non-Big-Four firms that there is insufficient choice in the market, the commission will interview representatives from Deloitte, Ernst & Young, PwC and KPMG over their dominance of the market.

While the Big Four will be called upon to defend their position, the commission has said that it has seen no evidence of a strong link between market concentration and price and quality.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send

Charterhouse Accountants

Finance Officer

Charterhouse Accountants, Beaconsfield, Permanent, Full Time, £ Competitive




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.