STRONG OPPOSITION has been voiced against the ICAEW’s move to outline how advising on aggressive tax avoidance is a potential disciplinary matter.
Three-quarters of the 60 readers polled online by Accountancy Age said they did not agree with the ICAEW’s decision, while 17% were completely behind the move. Some 5% agreed, but felt the guidance was too vague, and 3% were unsure.
The help sheet, released on 27 July, outlines how to spot tax avoidance schemes and advises that involvement in such schemes could see members held as bringing the profession into disrepute.
At present, the ICAEW is the only institute to have taken such a stance, while there has been a mixed reaction from other professional bodies. The UK200Group has been critical of the stance, while the Society of Professional Accountants – which represents about 1,600 accountants in small practices as well as sole practitioners – has been more supportive.
Should Should AADB disciplinary reprimands be based on the size of the sinner or the sin? Click here to vote in Accountancy Age‘s latest poll.
Law Society claims that the public interest cannot prove to have been served by the ICAEW's move into probate - and as such should not be used by the institute as evidence to back its push into further legal services
The body will start to accept applications from parties wishing to obtain a partial licence on 1 July 2016
Duncan Wiggetts is to be ICAEW’s new executive director for professional standards
New qualification in preventing corruption and fraud to be offered by CIPFA in wake of new corporate corruption laws