COMPANIES THAT SET UP complex tax schemes for clients could face fines if they fail to reveal the individuals taking advantage of the arrangements.
Treasury minister David Gauke will tell think tank Policy Exchange this morning that aggressive schemes "damage" the government's ability to fund public services and "provide support to those who need it".
The latest words from a government minister increases the stakes on those operating aggressive tax avoidance schemes, following rhetoric from both the prime minster David Cameron and chancellor George Osborne.
However, advisors believe that better tax legislation – and a more simple system – would deal with many of the concerns involving complex schemes. They argue that they are ethically bound to make sure their clients pay the minimum amount of tax within the confines of the law.
Visit Accountancy Age later for more details from Gauke's Policy Exchange speech.
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.