ANNUAL BUDGETS cause short-termism from the government – instead they should take place at a minimum of every three years, according to ICAS.
Stability and certainty would arise from a longer-term budgeting process, it argues.
"A longer-term approach would encourage governments to set a clear strategy for the taxation system and avoid the political temptation of an eye-catching announcement every year", said Derek Allen, director of tax at ICAS.
"If there is only one Budget every few years, changes to the taxation system outside that process may also attract a better level of scrutiny from MPs. At present, it is not realistic to expect many MPs to look in detail at 600-plus pages of legislation."
The institute cites the U-turns taken by the chancellor on a number of issues announced in this March's budget, including the ‘pasty tax', static caravan VAT charge, the exemption of charitable donations from the £50,000 tax relief cap, as well as the fuel duty increase freeze.
"The UK tax law is too complex and lacks stability. If government is serious about promoting a stable tax regime, then annual change to the UK's fiscal arrangements should be avoided unless it is vital for economic growth," added Allen.
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.