ANNUAL BUDGETS cause short-termism from the government – instead they should take place at a minimum of every three years, according to ICAS.
Stability and certainty would arise from a longer-term budgeting process, it argues.
“A longer-term approach would encourage governments to set a clear strategy for the taxation system and avoid the political temptation of an eye-catching announcement every year”, said Derek Allen, director of tax at ICAS.
“If there is only one Budget every few years, changes to the taxation system outside that process may also attract a better level of scrutiny from MPs. At present, it is not realistic to expect many MPs to look in detail at 600-plus pages of legislation.”
The institute cites the U-turns taken by the chancellor on a number of issues announced in this March’s budget, including the ‘pasty tax’, static caravan VAT charge, the exemption of charitable donations from the £50,000 tax relief cap, as well as the fuel duty increase freeze.
“The UK tax law is too complex and lacks stability. If government is serious about promoting a stable tax regime, then annual change to the UK’s fiscal arrangements should be avoided unless it is vital for economic growth,” added Allen.
The latest edition of our 'Seven days in accountancy' quiz is here
HMRC taskforces have recovered more than £500m since they were launched five years ago
The England and Wales Cricket board has hit HMRC for six in its VAT battle with the government department
EC adopts rules on the reporting by multinational companies of tax-related information