Lehman loses against Pensions Regulator in High Court

by Michael Bow

More from this author

20 Jun 2012

  • Comments
lehman-bros

THE HIGH COURT has ruled against a consortium of 38 Lehman Brothers subsidiary companies fighting to be excluded from financial support directions (FSDs) by the Pensions Regulator.

The 38 firms had been fighting to have the Upper Tribunal reject an appeal to involve them in FSD proceedings, Accountancy Age's sister publication Professional Pensions reports.

The appeal to hit the 38 firms with FSDs was launched by a smaller group of six Lehmans subsidiaries, which were themselves issued FSDs by the regulator's Determination Panel in 2010.

Judge Bishopp and judge Herrington, sitting in the Upper Tribunal tax and chancery chamber, ruled the six firms and the trustees were legally allowed to appeal the panel's decision not to impose an FSD as they were "directly affected" persons in the action.

They also ruled the two-year time limit under which the panel had to issue an FSD did not apply because the limit only applies to TPR's administrative process.

Nabarro Partner Anne-Marie Winton said: "The Upper Tribunal's decision that once an FSD has been issued it is OK to add further companies into its scope, without taking any account of the two-year period within which the regulator has to exercise this power, is surprising.

"This looks very much like the regulator being able to have two bites of the cherry. Additional targets could be at risk of being required to provide financial support to a scheme, even though any link they had with the scheme ended more than two years ago."

A regulator spokesman said: "The Upper Tribunal has found that trustees are 'directly affected parties', and are therefore able to refer decisions of the Determinations Panel to the Upper Tribunal. We welcome the clarification to this complex area of law."

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Send

Financial Planning and Performance AnalystCabinet Office-Greater London-Competitive

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.