Rangers FC administrators hit back at SFA

by Rachael Singh

More from this author

24 Apr 2012

  • Comments
Rangers

DUFF & PHELPS administrators to Rangers FC have hit back at the Scottish Football Association over its decision to fine the club £160,000 and slap it with a 12 month transfer embargo for entering into administration.

The administrators have claimed the decision is "quite extraordinary" and will "hinder" any future sale process they are trying to achieve.

Last night the SFA announced it would charge Rangers FC £160,000 for failing to observe statutes and directives (£10,000), entering into an insolvency process (£50,000) and for bringing the game into disrepute (£100,000). It has also issued the club with a 12 month transfer embargo on anyone over the age of 19.

Paul Clark and David Whitehouse, both partners at Duff & Phelps, were appointed on 14 February.

Whitehouse said he was not sure whether the judgement was lawful. This is the first time a club has been fined for entering insolvency proceedings.

"We are unsure as to whether the judicial panel fully understood or considered the commercial impact upon both the Club and Scottish Football of these measures, nor are we satisfied at this stage as to whether these sanctions are indeed lawful," he said.

"The decision of last night's judicial panel is in our opinion quite extraordinary. Not only in our opinion do the panel fail to have properly apportioned culpability between the Club and Craig Whyte, [majority owner of the club] they appear to have rendered a penalty which could have a very detrimental effect on the ability of the administrators to achieve a sale of the business.

"This, in turn, cannot be in the interests of Rangers Football Club or Scottish football in general."

He also likened the decision to enforce a transfer embargo to an administrator of a collapsed company trying to sell the business on without it being able to buy stock for a year.

A source close to the case confirmed the administrators would appeal the landmark decision with the expectation that the case would be heard as early as next week. 

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Send

Appointments to University Committees

University of Glasgow 120x60University of Glasgow - Glasgow - unremunerated positions

 

 

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.