R3 defends profession against British Property Federation

by Rachael Singh

More from this author

20 Apr 2012

  • Comments
Lee Manning

THE INSOLVENCY profession has hit back at claims from the British Property Federation that pre-packs need to be updated to restore fairness.

Lee Manning (pictured) insolvency trade body R3 vice-president, said: "We do not accept that the UK's insolvency system is not fair."

He added, in an insolvency situation a business has no money so creditors are unlikely to be satisfied with the outcome.

However, he hit back that landlords need to be flexible to help companies before the point of insolvency.

"Retailers are struggling with leases that were set up during the good times and set up many years ago. It is time for landlords to be more flexible before the point at which struggling businesses reach insolvency.

"We should all be working together to preserve jobs in tough economic times."

A pre-pack is where the sale of a business is arranged prior to it entering administration and sold immediately after entering into the process.

The BPF has launched a campaign "Taking the Profit" in conjunction with the Association of British Insurers, which also claimed practitioners should focus on ensuring the highest return to the creditors and not favour potential buyers.

Nick Starling, director of general insurance at the ABI, said: "Despite the professional and legal rules designed to prevent abuse, it is inevitable that a large proportion of pre-pack transactions will be structured to favour the owners of the business and their secured finance providers, who initially engage the insolvency practitioner and are privy to the design of the scheme, at the expense of unsecured creditors."

The BPF wants pre-packs to be more transparent to include information as to what concessions in retail collapses will be included in a sale; and a single point for making complaints about a process that does not involve the courts, among others points.

Manning added that R3 was currently in discussions with government to look at ways to improve transparency and trust in the pre-pack process. He added he would appreciate the opportunity to discuss the BPF's concerns and to reach a conclusion.

Earlier this year the government made a u-turn on proposed changes to pre-packs which would have seen the process delayed by up to three days if a business was sold to a connected party.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send


Financial Planner

The Ministry of Defence Surgeon General’s (SG) Finance Department, Lichfield, Staffordshire, Permanent, Full Time, £ £30,008




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.