ICAS HAS CRICITISED the Financial Reporting Councils audit reforms as not putting enough pressure on auditors to give their opinions on reports.
The institute was responding to a consultation document, published today, claiming that the change does not go far enough as auditors will only have to publish their opinion on the narrative section of an annual report if they believe it is not “fair and balanced”.
However, the Scottish Institute claims that auditors should give their opinion on the narrative front part of all annual reports.
“The proposal that auditors would only report by exception – in circumstances where they believe that the content of such reports is not fair, balanced and reasonable – fails to properly fill the assurance vacuum in this area,” said ICAS director of technical policy James Barbour.
“Research undertaken on behalf of ICAS revealed a genuine demand amongst investors for assurance on the narrative information contained in annual reports. We believe that this demand would be best satisfied by auditors being asked to opine on whether such information is deemed fair and balanced. Reporting by exception, we believe, does not place sufficient emphasis on an increasingly important part of corporate reporting.”
The latest edition of our 'Seven Days in Accountancy' quiz is here
Audit red tape is impacting both ends of the market, according to the latest watchdog stats
CIoT has warned that businesses undertaking some commercial transactions will face unnecessary uncertainty because of a lack of clarity about the breadth of a new anti-avoidance tax rule
EY has appointed Janet Dawson as its global and UK&I government & public sector assurance practice leader