THE LIKELY INTRODUCTION of a general ‘anti-abuse’ rule has met with a muted response from the tax profession.
Already well-trailed prior to the Budget, the biggest concern among the professional community is that of where the lie will be drawn that tips advice beyond an acceptable line.
DLA Piper tax partner Richard Woolich said that while there was good news about business taxation on the whole, it must be kept in context of the looming GAAR. “…We fear that the introduction of the GAAR may detract from this by introducing uncertainty into the system and stopping not just aggressive avoidance, but sensible and prudent structuring,” said Woolich.
BDO tax manager Ross McKay was more philosophical about the GAAR consultation.
While it was likely to “throw a net” over tax avoidance schemes, concerns of it capturing ‘tax mitigation’ rather than aggressive tax schemes should hopefully be covered in the consultation. “Hopefully that will be weeded out,” said McKay.
Chris Morgan, head of tax policy, at KPMG in the UK, said: “Protecting tax revenues by tackling artificial avoidance is clearly a priority for the government, and KPMG supports a fair and competitive tax system. However, while the overall aims of a GAAR are clear, it can be difficult to apply in practice.
“If it is limited to stopping transactions with no business purpose, the GAAR should be relatively easy to apply. The difficulty arises where it also affects commercial transactions which are perceived to include unacceptable tax driven steps.”
Chris Sanger, head of tax policy at Ernst & Young, said: “Whilst confirmation that the implementation of a GAAR may not come as a surprise, how this will be achieved will continue to be a cause for concern.
The future consultation will need to clearly set out the government’s proposed approach and avoid introducing significant uncertainty into the tax regime.
“Businesses will be closely watching any draft legislation to see whether the proposals have the potential to develop and expand in scope, beyond Aaronson’s original intent.
“This remains a delicate area, where the Government needs to be wary of introducing uncertainty that could undermine the UK’s competitiveness.”
CIot urges HMRC to consider a delay to the 1 September 2017 introduction of its new corporate offence of failure to prevent the criminal facilitation of tax evasion
HMRC intends to extend the date for withdrawal of transitional relief on investment growth from 30 November 2016 to 31 March 2017
The current business rates system is over-complex and reform is needed, but reforms should focus first of all on simplifying the appeals process, particularly for businesses which are subject to business rates exemption
The CIoT has called on the government to rethink its approach to ensuring online sellers pay the correct amount of VAT.