aop
ad

New financial services body to discipline auditors

by Rachael Singh

More from this author

27 Jan 2012

frc-logo

THE FSA'S successor could have stronger powers to discipline auditors, potentially creating an overlap with the accountancy profession's watchdog.

The Financial Services Bill, which introduces a new regulatory regime to replace the FSA, includes new disciplinary powers aimed at punishing auditors.

The ICAEW has said it believes the new powers are an extension of existing controls, however, the Financial Reporting Council has argued against the institute's opinion.

According to the ICAEW, the FSA currently has the ability to reprimand auditors by disqualifying them. However, these powers only apply to a narrow scope of an auditors' role, where they fail to comply with the financial services and markets act - which can include not co-operating properly with the FSA.

The bill states that it has created "new powers to take disciplinary and supervisory action", which includes disqualifying an auditor from working with a financial service company, imposing a financial penalty and publicly censoring them.

The new powers could potentially cause an overlap with the accounting profession's watchdog the Financial Reporting Council.

Iain Coke, head of financial services at the ICAEW, said the latest bill had "widened" the financial regulator's powers but believed that disciplinary matters against auditors was better placed with the FRC.

Coke also questioned whether it was wise to have a number of bodies looking at audit issues where one could work better.

However, a spokesman from the FRC said the latest bill was not a change from the current powers already held by the financial regulator.

The details were uveiled in the Financial Services Bill, which includes the abolition of Financial Services Authority and the introduction of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA).

Earlier this year FRC disciplinary arm the AADB fined PwC £1.4m for falling short of requirements in its audit of JP Morgan Securities Limited and has several investigations pending, including a complaint against jailed accountant and former Langbar chief Stuart Pearson.

Visitor comments Add your comment

More of the same

Rest assured that the quality of regulation won't increase but the cost will. Just the same as when the FSA took over regulating IFA's.

Posted by: JohnB, 30 Jan 2012 | 11:27

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities