22 Dec 2011
A PROTEST GROUP has launched formal legal proceedings in an attempt to reverse the deal that let Goldman Sachs off paying interest payments on its tax bill.
UK Uncut Legal Action logged an application for a judicial review at the administrative court in London today. The group has claimed that HM Revenue & Customs had not been forthcoming in giving details to the Public Accounts Committee.
Further reading
HMRC has admitted that there was an error in the agreement that meant the investment bank did not have to pay interest payments. The National Audit Office has estimated that the error lost the Exchequer £5m-£8m, but a whistleblower who worked in the HMRC legal department estimated the error at £20m.
"We feel it is now undeniably in the public interest that this judicial review goes ahead in order to reverse the alleged decision by HMRC to let Goldman Sachs off up to £20m in tax and reclaim this money for the UK taxpayer," a statement from UK Uncut Legal Action said.
Legal firm Leigh Day & Co are taking on the case on a "no win, no fee" basis. Leigh Day & Co's Richard Stein said: "We wrote to the HMRC in October asking them to quash the deal and reclaim the millions unpaid in taxes from one of the world's richest banks but received no response. We chased again in November and they claimed they needed more time."
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
too right !!
You'd think the Govt would get a grip of this, instead of a private case having to be brought. It begs the question why Cameron and Co don't want to delve into this...vested interests..or just a plain coward who finds it a lot easier to hammer the poorer defenceless members of society.
Either way, confidence in the 'establishment' is very low and trust is probably lower...well done UKUncut for taking over the job of the Govt...and good luck !
Posted by: peter jackson, 22 Dec 2011 | 12:12