12 Dec 2011
THE GOLDMAN SACHS deal cost the Exchequer £20m, twice the amount previously estimated, a former HM Revenue & Customs solicitor has claimed.
Osita Mba told the Public Accounts Committee, which is investigating the deal, that the interest payments foregone by HMRC were "£20m in rough figures". Mba claimed that evidence submitted to the committee was "significant, inaccurate and misleading".The committee has repeatedly questioned Dave Hartnett, permanent secretary for tax, about the deal.
Further reading
The deal concerned National Insurance contributions on employees' bonuses. In 2005, 21 companies paid the full amount owed from the use of employee benefit trusts, offshore vehicles designed to avoid NI contributions, but Goldman Sachs refused. The bank was warned that it would have to pay interest when the bill was finally settled, but when it paid up in 2011, no interest was charged.
Richard Bacon, a member of the PAC, told the Daily Telegraph: "Given that Hartnett did not even know, until I told him, that HMRC had warned Goldman it would be liable for interest accruing if it refused to settle, I am not prepared to say Hartnett deliberately misled the committee. It seems to me just as likely he did not know what was going on."
A spokesman for HMRC said: "Dave Hartnett's evidence to the PAC is entirely consistent and accurate. Hartnett made clear that an error occurred and the Comptroller and Auditor General is on record as saying this error was between £5m and £8m."
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
£20 million seem accurate
This written by the whistleblower, citing both internal papers and Tribunal judgment, seems accurate to me http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmpubacc/1531/1531we03.htm
i wondered how the NAO got £5-8million when interest is supposed to be a fixed anount.
Posted by: Austin, 12 Dec 2011 | 11:10