08 Nov 2011
THE £30m deal struck between HM Revenue & Customs and Goldman Sachs could have been renegotiated, MPs were told yesterday.
HMRC counsel Anthony Inglese admitted yesterday on oath to the Public Accounts Committee that HMRC could renegotiate the deal after a mistake was found that lost the Exchequer £8m. However, Inglese said that he advised Hartnett not to renegotiate the deal over Goldman Sachs' use of employee benefit trusts to avoid paying National Insurance contributions.
Further reading
It also emerged that the tax bill under consideration was for £30m. Court papers from a 2009 case heard by Mr Justice Norris shows that HMRC commenced proceedings in 2003 seeking repayment of some £30.8m of unpaid NIC and interest.
The controversy centres around Goldman Sachs' refusal to pay the bill at the time, in contrast with 21 other companies that were using employee benefit trusts, which offer employees loans that do not incur NI payments. HMRC said that the refusal to do so would mean the bank would pay interest on the bill when it was finally paid. However, the deal struck in 2010 did not charge Goldman Sachs interest. HMRC has said this was due an error that it refuses to disclose.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment