14 Sep 2011
THE EXTENSION of VAT to "nearly all spending" is one of the radical reforms proposed by the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) to simplify the "overly complex and frequently unfair" tax system.
The IFS published the final part of its five-year Mirrlees Review today. It said that the system's complexity was costing the UK tens of billions of pounds a year. The IFS had previously called for the merger of income tax and National Insurance, which was reaffirmed today.
Further reading
An extension of VAT would reduce complexity and costly distortions to consumption choices, the review says. Paul Johnson, director of the IFS, said that zero rating certain products was an "inefficient means of redistribution, as the rich will buy food too". Alongside this, the report suggests that an equivalent to VAT should be charged on financial services as the current model both favours the sector and creates needless complexity.
Among the other proposals included: the removal of taxation on risk-free savings, such as standard bank and building society accounts: the abolition of stamp duty; the taxation of petrol and diesel being replaced by congestion charging; and more consistent carbon emission taxation.
The institute was clear that this was an aspiration for where the tax system should be in ten or 20 years. Political difficulties mean these reforms cannot be viewed on their own and must be considered as a whole, with a gradual move towards this new system.
"The review shows how national income and employment could be significantly increased through effective tax reform. A government focused on growth cannot afford to ignore some of the fundamental reforms required to the tax system," Johnson said.
"That does not mean small gimmicks and one-off allowances; it means a long-term, considered and systematic approach to tax policy. This is an approach that has been sadly lacking for many years," he added.
A Treasury spokesperson said: "The government has embarked on a programme of ambitious reforms of the tax system to address the instability of recent years. These are based on clear principles to support growth, reward work, reduce complexity and increase fairness. We have already taken over 800,000 of the lowest earners out of tax, reduced corporation tax and established the independent Office of Tax Simplification."
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
Tax simplification: not as simple as it sounds
Having read the IFS proposals, their views are far too simplistic and achieving it certainly wouldn't be straightforward: http://www.thevatconsultancy.com/blog/2011/09/would-the-ifs-calls-for-tax-simplification-be-as-simple-as-they-sound/
Posted by: John Crawford, 14 Sep 2011 | 12:38
Not bloody likely
Food spending as a percentage of income is vastly higher for the poor than the rich. Either someone at the IFS needs to look up marginal propensity to consume or, worse, they are well aware.
I suspect the financial services sector, of all people, are well placed to deal with the complexity of partial exemption.
I should hope this would exclude homes?
Assuming most people spend about 1/3 on their incomes on rent/mortgage, adding VAT would be equivalent to a 6% effective income tax increase.
It would add 20% to the price of a home for a first time buyer (people selling their homes only pay the net difference), hardly stimulating a dreadful sector.
Posted by: Dave, 14 Sep 2011 | 19:16