07 Sep 2011
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS that leave pensions prey to market volatility are undermining the sector and pushing companies to close viable schemes, a new report has claimed.
The National Association of Pension Funds warned mark-to-market accounting is "inappropriate" for pension schemes, as it introduces short-term volatility to products whose economic position changes slowly over time.
Further reading
Companies could pursue overly cautious investment policies to avoid this effect, inadvertently ramping up the cost of pensions and reliance on low-return government bonds.
NAPF chairman Lindsay Tomlinson said: "The current standards are not appropriate for the long-term nature of pensions. They allow short-term stock market volatility to perversely affect pensions and their long-term strategy by presenting large deficits which may prove inaccurate in the long run."
Employers worried about "allegedly large" deficits might close defined benefit pension schemes to existing and future members, and the low-return investment strategy could deal another blow to the economy, she warned.
Tomlinson accused standard setters of operating in a "vacuum of accountability", focusing too much on theory rather than practice. They "need to have a real-world approach that truly takes into account the economic consequences of their actions", she concluded.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
A new Standard for Pension Schemes?
The present Standard was appropriate for its time but it has been overtaken by economic and financial events and there is a need for a major re-appraisal. I support the NAPF comments and we should look for a new standard which aims to overcome the volatility of FRS17 and its academic approach which produces a virtually incomprehensible 'explanation'..
Posted by: Desmond Goch, 08 Sep 2011 | 09:20