aop
ad

Taxman shunning independent Time to Pay reviews

by Jaimie Kaffash

More from this author

15 Aug 2011

hmrc-1

THE TAXMAN has been agreeing multimillion-pound Time to Pay (TTP) arrangements without requiring businesses to undertake independent reviews to check their viability, Accountancy Age can reveal.

Earlier this month, HM Revenue & Customs released its figures on TTP arrangements, which allow businesses to defer their tax bills.

An analysis of the data by Accountancy Age showed that 140 high-value arrangements – those above £100,000 a year – worth £45m were made in June, at an average of £321,000 each. This compares with an average of around £180,000 to £200,000 in each of the previous 15 months.

An HM Revenue & Customs spokesman said that a small number of very high-value arrangements made in June skewed the figures and, if it were not for these, the average would be similar to other months. The research showed that these arrangements would have to be collectively worth around £17m to skew the June average figures to this extent.

Former chancellor Alistair Darling announced in the 2009 Pre-Budget Report that: "HMRC will require businesses applying for Time to Pay for debts of £1m or over to provide an independent business review (IBR) in support of their request". These would require the businesses to appoint insolvency practitioners to review their long-term viability.

However, a freedom of information request has shown that no IBRs were carried out in June and only six had been carried out in total between January 2010 and June 2011.

The HMRC spokesman said: "HMRC will not always require an IBR in £1m+ cases; this is because each Time to Pay request is considered on its own merits and the specific facts in the individual case.

"HMRC has only required an IBR in a handful of cases since the announcement that HMRC would consider seeking such a review in those cases where additional Time to Pay was being sought and the tax involved exceeded £1m."

The shadow exchequer secretary to the Treasury, David Hanson, has said he will write to his opposite number, David Gauke, for an explanation of these figures.

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities