PwC must improve goodwill impairment auditing

PwC must improve goodwill impairment auditing

Audit Inspection Unit finds issue with PwC's goodwill impairment and revenues audit work

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE has been gathered by PwC auditors when gauging clients’ goodwill impairment and revenues, according to a report by the industry watchdog.

The Audit Inspection Unit’s 2010/2011 report into the firm found issues over the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained or recorded to support the related carrying values from goodwill assessments.

Two FTSE 100 audits contained errors in disclosures that went unidentified by the auditors.

Revenue issues were found with the majority of the 15 audits inspected by the AIU. In five, a lack of detailed testing, substantive analytical procedures and a response to fraud-related risks were highlighted. Seven of the 15 audits inspected were performed to a “good standard, another seven were to an “acceptable” standard while a further one required “significant improvement”.

The audit that required “significant improvement” was a UK subsidiary of an overseas bank. There was insufficient audit evidence for key aspects of the audit, including reliance on management’s testing of controls. The AIU also flagged concerns over the extent of audit evidence obtained or recorded in key areas such as the valuation of financial assets and provisions for loan impairments.

PwC auditors failed to formally report their findings and conclusions on a FTSE 100 audit to its audit committee.

On another FTSE 100 audit, IT consulting services were provided to the client from PwC’s then newly-acquired Paragon Consulting. Paragon’s work included updating the client’s financial reporting system.

“It was not clear from the audit team’s written assessment why this did not give rise to an unacceptable threat to the firm’s independence,” stated the report by AIU director Andrew Jones.

The AIU also found an audit director who had included details of his success in selling non-audit services to audit clients in his reference pack, when applying for a partner position.

In a written response to the AIU, PwC’s Richard Sexton said the firm was “committed to addressing the issues that you have identified in your review and to implementing the detailed action plan that has been agreed between us”.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource