aop
ad

CFC rules could contravene EU law

by Jaimie Kaffash

More from this author

01 Jul 2011

European and British flags

THE GOVERNMENT'S reforms to controlled foreign companies (CFC) legislation might not make them compatible with European Union law, experts have warned.

A consultation document released yesterday fleshed out the details behind the reduction in the tax charge on overseas profits for finance companies to 5.75%. Its aim was to "improve the competitiveness of the UK corporate tax system and protecting the UK tax base against avoidance". It would do this by exempting foreign profits where there is no artificial diversion, not taxing profits where they arose from genuine economic activity and targeting "artificially diverted UK profits".

Gary Richards, tax partner at Berwin Leighton Paisner, said that the final point could be contentious: "One issue which remains is whether HMRC's view that EU law permits a UK tax charge on artificially diverted profits is right, or if even these reforms may yet be open to challenge."

The reforms were broadly welcomed by the profession. Barry Murphy, a partner at PwC, said the reforms "delivered" on the government's promise to business. He added that "it will be critical" that the measures meet EU criteria and it is likely this will be the "focus of discussions over the coming weeks and months".

The European Commission has previously criticised the UK for failing to take into account European case law surrounding freedom of establishment and free movement of capital.

There was also some concern over intellectual property taxation. Murphy said: "It's not all good news because there is clearly a way to go in working out a satisfactory regime for intellectual property; the policy on the treatment of some common operations such as procurement operations, leasing, captive insurance companies and treasury companies leaves concerns."

Simon Palmer, international tax partner at KPMG in the UK, said the position of intellectual property used overseas looks "problematic". He higlighted that the rules look as if they will "increase the compliance burden" for consumer goods businesses and other heavy users of intellectual property.

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Send

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.