THE INSOLVENCY TRADE BODY is concerned over costs to proposed radical changes to insolvency profession.
Coulson, managing partner at Moon Beever, is concerned the costs to change the regulatory model may "outweigh" the benefits.
"We support greater transparency and consistency, but the degree of increased regulation proposed is disproportionate and counter to current government policy to reduce red tape," she said.
The consultation looked at three main areas to change including the creation of an independent complaints body and reforming the current regulatory framework.
"Under the new proposals, the cost of making a complaint is free to the complainant, which means that complaints not upheld will be paid for out of the insolvent estate. This will lower returns to creditors. As insolvency cases are a hotbed for vexatious complainants, these are likely to become a more common, yet undesirable, occurrence.
"The Service must balance accessibility with protections against malicious complainants to safeguard creditors' money."
She added that R3 backed a "simpler and more practical solution". The trade body believes the existing structure can be streamlined.
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.