09 Feb 2011
CALLS TO DELAY the introduction of iXBRL have been rejected by the Exchequer secretary to the Treasury.
The major accounting institutes had urged a delay to the introduction of iXBRL.
Further reading
From 1 April all corporation tax submissions must be filed to HMRC using the new technology. The institutes wanted a delay because of concerns that software houses were too late to produce adequate software to deal with the new filing format.
Six of the main institutes wrote to the exchequer secretary to the Treasury, David Gauke, requesting the government push back the implementation deadline by about six months.
Gauke has responded that the start date will remain as 1 April.
He said: "My objective is the smooth introduction of mandatory online filing of CT returns in iXBRL format from 1 April 2011. It seems to me that there will never be a perfect time to mandate filing in iXBRL. There will always be implementation challenges, and HMRC's challenge here is to work through them in collaboration with the representative bodies."
Gauke added, the taxman will adopt a soft landing for the first two years of introduction. Filers with a "reasonable excuse" who have made mistakes in their corporation tax submission will not face any penalties. HMRC will publish guidance on "what constitutes reasonable excuse".
Gauke's response can be accessed here.
Update:
Donald Drysdale, assistant director of tax at ICAS, said: "While the potential benefits to HMRC are obvious, companies and tax agents are left picking up the costs.
"Most of them must rely on commercial software vendors, some of whom have failed to deliver their accounts preparation solutions in time. Other packages fail to offer the degree of automated iXBRL tagging that had been anticipated, leaving skilled staff with the cumbersome task of completing the tagging manually.
"He [Gauke] has expressed the wish that any transitional issues should be managed effectively, emphasising that no-one who has made a reasonable effort to comply will be penalised and that anyone with real difficulties should contact HMRC.
This is far from ideal, given that contacting HMRC can be an almost impossible task at the best of times."
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
iXBRL woes
There are many, many thousands of different items that need tagging and it is fiddly, complex and time consuming, even with our bulletproof software (I have never even heard the word Tuple before). I foresee that a lot of rubbish will get filed under iXBRL as accountants have difficulty in getting the tagging right or who just can't spend the time on it. There are still very many accountants out there, let alone staff who who can barely use a PC. WIll HMRC start charging penalties for incorrect tagging after their 'soft landing' period has expired?
Posted by: Jon Griffey, 09 Feb 2011 | 13:01
Managed Tagging is the answer
This situation should not come as a surprise to anyone and was forecast by the vast majority of the industry.
That is where iXBRL Managed Tagging Suppliers come into the equation.
Not only can they undertake iXBRL tagging projects professionally and meet the deadlines with no significant investment required from the client, they can also be a great source of expertise and support to clients as they transition to reporting in this new format.
My company, SimplyXBRL, has made significant investments recently to ensure we can meet all the iXBRL the needs of our clients and we’d be delighted to assist any companies requiring our services who have been let down by their auditors and/or software.
John White
CEO
SimplyXBRL.com
Posted by: John White, 09 Feb 2011 | 20:08