15 Dec 2010
TWO ICAEW chartered accountants were fined and banned by the Financial Services Authority for their involvement in a boiler room scam.
Paolo Maranzana and Laurence Finger, of Sedley Richard Laurence Voulters (SRLV), were fined £105,000 and £35,000 respectively for their involvement in the scam. Maranzana was banned from working in financial services while Finger was banned from serving as a money laundering officer. The firm, which is authorised by the FSA, was fined £163,140.
Further reading
SRLV was appointed by client NSL to assist a fund-raising by receiving and dispersing money through the client's bank accounts, and provide secretarial services to the client's sister company.
NSL used overseas entities to sell shares to investors, but the entities were share fraud operators who subjected more than 1,000 potential investors to high-pressure selling techniques in so-called "boiler rooms".
They paid more than £2.5m into the bank accounts operated by SRLV, with significant sums paid back to the boiler rooms rather than going back to the client NSL.
Boiler rooms would not be able to operate effectively without the assistance of firms such as SRLV, said the FSA.
Despite warning signs of possible financial crime, SRLV continued to disburse money to the boiler rooms.
"Authorised firms and their employees have an important role to play in combating financial crime. This means that they cannot turn a blind eye when they see warning signs that their clients might be involved in financial crime," said FSA managing director of enforcement and financial crime Margaret Cole.
"In this case, the failures by SRLV, Finger and Maranzana to carry out their responsibilities had an impact on consumers who have probably lost their money by investing through boiler rooms."
Maranzana and Finger agreed to settle at an early stage and therefore qualified for a 30% discount under the FSA's executive settlement procedures. SRLV also settled at an early stage.
The investigation was carried out with the close cooperation of the City of London Police Economic Crime Directorate.
A spokesman for Sedley Richard Laurence Voulters said: "The FSA's decision relates to events of two years ago in respect of Natrocell Limited. It is a former client of the firm, for whom Paolo Maranzana, a former partner, had been responsible.
"The firm did not provide audit, accounting or taxation services to Natrocell during the period, only company secretarial services and access to a client account. The firm was not involved in the sale or promotion of shares.
"We would like to stress that the FSA makes it clear that the honesty of the firm, and its managing partner Laurence Finger and former partner Paolo Maranzana has never been called into question.
"Sedley Richard Laurence Voulters has recently undertaken a thorough review of its systems with the assistance of external advisors. A robust procedure has now been implemented to ensure that there can be no repeat of this one-off issue."
Update 17 Dec, 9am
The ICAEW refused to comment on the case involving Paolo Maranzana and Laurence Finger. However, it confirmed that under institute bylaws a guilty verdict in a regulatory procedure under the Financial Servioces and Markets Act "shall be conclusive evidence of misconduct".
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
ICAEW Paolo Maranzana and Laurence Finger
Have the ICAEW disqualified Paolo Maranzana and Laurence Finger from practising as accountants and permanently expelled them as memebers of the ICAEW?
Posted by: David, 15 Dec 2010 | 13:19
Amazing but true
Its all well and good fining and banning these accountants but it hardly seems the way forward to me.
The people that cold call British citizens and ''persuade'' them to part with their hard earned cash would be locked up for quite a number of years once the police bring them to task, I believe 3 to 5 years is the norm?
So why is it that these so called accountants get merely a fine and a slap on the wrist? After all they are the ones responsible for facilitating these crimes in the first place. Without banks and paperwork these boiler room criminals are nothing else but a voice on the phone. I think the police and the FSA need to apply an even hand when it comes to justice. And justice for all?
Posted by: James Baird, 31 Dec 2010 | 20:00
very true jimbo...
the bottom line is boiler rooms are a sideline not only for uk accountants but also for a number of regulated brokerages who seek to inflate there revenues and coms by working with boiler rooms.
no brainer if a fine represents small % of what they will earn...no prison either hence not much risk son...
Posted by: martin sharpe, 04 May 2011 | 00:03