12 Mar 2010
PwC, administrators of Lehman Brothers European business, is considering its next move in the wake of a damning report which criticises accounting policies at the investment bank and the role of auditors Ernst & Young.
A senior figure close to the administrators confirmed they had the option to pursue the auditors through the courts if they concluded there was a case to answer.
Accountancy Age understands PwC administrators are considering the report and their next steps.
The source said the issue was "too complex" to provide a snap judgement.
Administrators will take their time to digest the facts contained in the 2,200 page dossier before deciding whether to take the matter to court.
A report for the US Bankruptcy Court released late on Thursday accused E &Y of being "professionally negligent" in its audit of the collapsed banking giant.
E&Y dispute the allegations.
The report centred on the use of so called repo transactions, used to move high risk assets off its balance sheet.
It claimed the transactions - known as Repo 105s - had no economic substance.
PwC is continuing its attempts to claw back cash for creditors of Lehman Brothers European arm. Administrators have already returned $13.3bn (£8.8bn) to creditors, as of September last year.
Ernst & Young said in response to the publication of the report:
“Lehman’s bankruptcy, which occurred in September 2008, was the result of a series of unprecedented adverse events in the financial markets. Our last audit of the Company was for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2007. Our opinion indicated that Lehman’s financial statements for that year were fairly presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and we remain of that view.
"After an exhaustive investigation the Examiner made no findings in his report that Lehman’s assets or liabilities were improperly valued or accounted for incorrectly in Lehman’s November 30 2007 financial statements.
"The leverage ratios that were reported in Lehman’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) were the responsibility of management, not the auditor. They are not part of the audited financial statements."
This would not be the first time administrators have gone after the auditors of a collapsed company.
In 2005, PwC sued auditors KPMG for negligence over the collapse of insurance giant Independent Insurance. The case was settled out ofcourt.
Read more:
E &Y negligent in Lehman audit, report claims
Report claims E&Y knew about repo transactions
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment