28 Jan 2010
The taxman is to launch an attack on football agents’ payments from player transfers which are suspected of being concealed in offshore accounts.
A senior source within HM Revenue & Customs said that a clampdown was required to foil tax avoidance in the multi-million pound deals.
It is understood HMRC has become concerned about payments to agents relating to player transfers being made through offshore structures.
“One of the things we’re going to have to get further inside are payments to [football] agents... It’s murky,” said the insider.
An HMRC spokesman said the Specialist Investigations Unit would contact agents directly – or the agent’s accountant – if they handled the transaction.
Agents are expected to pay 40% of their fees in income tax if they are unincorporated. According to a report for the Barclays Premier League, clubs spent £70.7m on agents’ fees last season in 803 transactions. The figures relate to payments to agents for the period October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
A separate report for The Football League on fees found that between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009 Football League clubs engaged in 3,727 player transactions. Clubs committed to pay a fee to an agent in 229 of those deals.
“No agent was used in 3,498 transactions. League clubs committed to spend £8,809,501 on agents’ fees,” the report added.
The HMRC insider said the department had become concerned that the taxman was being denied the full tax take from the football transfer industry.
“Certainly of interest with the bigger football transfers in the UK and in other countries is the huge proportion of the transfer fee which leaves football,” the source said.
The taxman has recently become aware that payments do not necessarily remain in the game and that a proportion are making their way to Panama, Switzerland or Gibraltar either for the agent and in some instances for the players.
The Football Association responded by saying it ensured all transfers
were completed properly because it acted as a clearing house for every
transaction made. However, its mandate ends once the money reaches the selling
club.
Tax experts said that the proportion of transfer fees bundled up in image rights was a particular bone of contention.
“I have heard some tales,” said Richard Mannion national head of tax at Smith & Williamson. “The amount of the transfer fee that is made up of image rights is an issue. The problems come when those image rights are paid into an offshore account.”
Derek Allen, ICAS director of taxation said: “Football agents and football players have a relatively large amount of income and not all of them declare it. When [HMRC] targets a particular sector like this it’s because they believe there is a serious failure in compliance. They clearly want to make sure they pick a yield from that activity.”
The FA said: “The FA handles all international transfer fees paid by member clubs through its ‘clearing house’ function which provides full transparency in the process. Likewise all payments to agents by English Clubs are required to be paid through the clearing house.
“This season The FA, through new requirements, has also sought greater transparency in the domestic transfer market with the publication of agents fees. For the first time this season this has resulted in a game-wide picture of the level of spending on agents.
“Our powers of investigation are wide-ranging and include the ability to request any participant, including clubs, to disclose any documentation they have in relation to our enquiries and to attend for interview. Where necessary we will provide assistance to HMRC and other statutory agencies if they have wider concerns.”
IN OUR VIEW
Is the crackdown on reported bad behaviour by football agents going to be hit by poor timing? Indebted clubs are unable to shell out large sums of money to bu y players.
Further reading:
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
Please please please
Once again the word avoidance is being confused with the word evasion, surely something that is concealed from the tax man in offshore accounts is evasion not avoidance. Please could we be more clear !
Posted by: Spike, 01 Feb 2010 | 00:00