aop
ad

OFT plans could push up cost of insolvency

by Rachael Singh

More from this author

07 Jul 2010

The cost of undertaking an administration could be pushed up if an Office of Fair Trading (OFT) proposal to introduce a complaints commission receives the go-ahead.

Industry experts warned that an industry-funded compaints body would add expense into the profession which would be passed onto creditors.

“The suggestion of having an industry-funded independent complaints handling body seems an unnecessary expense and an added level of complication," said John Alexander, partner and head of business recovery at Carter Backer Winter and one of the founding council members of SPI, now R3.

The OFT issued wide-ranging crtiticism into the insolvency market, in particular calling for reforms of the complaints process.

Alexander said the OFT's report had acknowledged that regulation by insolvency practitioner licensing bodies are "efficient" at investigating and disciplining members, so a new complaints commission is unnecessary.

Carl Faulds, the president of insolvency institute the Insolvency Practitioners Association (IPA), said the nature of administrations involves a high percentage of complaints - which is not necessarily down to IPs' mistakes.

"The number of complaints against practitioners is in part an inevitable by-product of insolvency work, as creditors and others almost inevitably by definition lose money or jobs or sometimes their businesses in an insolvency."

Faulds commented that the regulatory body of the insolvency profession, the Insolvency Service, said in its annual report that complaints are seldom related directly to a practitioner's performance or conduct in an administration.

However, Faulds said the IPA and other licensors need to play a key part in explaining insolvency and its consequences to complainants.

Steven Law, president of R3, concurs with Faulds, adding that R3 members agree the existing complaints procedure is "difficult to navigate".

Law said that all IPs have to state in correspondence, during an administration, what regulatory body the IP is from, but he said it was "not easy" for creditors and debtors to understand how to complain. It was about perception of open transparency that was at the heart of installing a complaints commission, he added.

The proposals are being looked at by insolvency’s government department, Business Innovation and Skills. It is believed that a consultation will be opened on the reforms later this year, with further discussion in the interim period.

Further reading:

OFT investigation into corporate insolvency ducked issues

Insolvency profession responds to OFT report

Insolvency Service backs OFT claim that practitioners charge too much

OFT wants "far-reaching reform" of corporate insolvency regime

Visitor comments Add your comment

JOHN ALEXANDER

You refer to John Alexander as being a co-founder of R3 - where on earth did you get that information from?

The founding fathers were many in the profession who have long since retired and I don't re-call John as being one of them. Yes he served (as many of us did) in the early days on the SPI Council (the Society of Parctitioners in Insolvency - which changed its name to R3).

If we as a profession cannot get our message accross then we deserve the "raps" we get.

I postulate that the fees charged by some of the large practises in running Administrations could be halved and even quartered if the "Appointers" chose to use the smaller practitioners who could give as good a service as their large firm colleagues!

Posted by: David Mond, 07 Jul 2010 | 00:00

IP fees

I have to stand up here and agree with David Mond - when my company went into Administration we went with a large firm who we later discovered, had overcharged us considerably. In hindsight, had we gone with David?s firm, Hodgsons, I feel we would have been given more attention and for better value in money.

Posted by: Eliott Cohen, 09 Jul 2010 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities