aop
ad

Former Haines Watts unit heading for CVA

by Rachael Singh

More from this author

25 Feb 2010

A former business unit of top 20 firm Haines Watts Group is heading into a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) with debts of more than £4m.

The unit, a grouping of Haines Watts practices previously called HWCA Ltd, was formed in 2005. But it struggled. Last August HWCA’s practices were transferred back out to Haines Watts’ regional businesses through management buyouts. The remaining shell, renamed Sixonethreeone, was left with more than £4m in assets from the buyouts.

Total liabilities will exceed the assets when the costs of entering Sixonethreeone into a CVA are taken into account. Accountancy Age understands that HMRC is owed £1.9m by Sixonethreeone, plus a further £1.9m to former directors.

Geoffrey Fairclough, chairman of Haines Watts Group has stressed that Sixonethreeone’s impending CVA would have no impact on the firm.

“The issues at Sixone­threeone have no impact on Haines Watts’ businesses, which all continue to trade normally,” said Fairclough.

Sixonethreeone also faces a winding-up order from former director Manish Patel for £73,000 to be heard in the courts on 24 March. However, it is expected that a creditor meeting to approve the CVA will take place before that date.

The most recent set of accounts filed by HWCA Ltd prior to changing its name to Sixonethreeone, was on 31 March 2008.

A statement in the HWCA accounts claimed 2008 was the first year to show a profit on its balance sheet due to an injection of more than £2m as share capital and converting £2.5m of borrowings to a five year loan.

The group consists of over 60 owner-managed firms through­out the UK.

Further reading:

Tenon snaps up Haines Watts Business Recovery

Visitor comments Add your comment

What happens to the Shareholders of Worthington Nicholls?

Does this move have anything to do with the AADB investigation in to the activities of HWCA Ltd in the run up to the Worthington Nicholls IPO, which is also being investigated by the SFO and is the subject of legal action by MSS (formerly known as Worthington Nicholls)?

http://www.frc.org.uk/aadb/press/pub1718.html

Lets hope this isn't a cynical ploy to avoid liability?

Posted by: John, 26 Feb 2010 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities