aop
ad

Deloitte and PwC disappointed at FII dividend case cap

by David Jetuah

More from this author

24 Feb 2010

Tax experts have expressed disappointment after a class action victory challenging the taxation of dividends to UK companies from overseas businesses was severely limited.

In the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Order spearheaded by tobacco giant BAT, judges said only claims dating from 2004 should be considered, freezing out claims stretching back to 1973.

The UK government had previously suggested £7bn could be at stake.

The first issue rested on BAT claiming compensation for paying more UK corporation tax on dividends received from EU divsions than it would have paid on similar UK-based dividends.

Companies also claimed compensation for having to pay more advance corporation tax than they would have had to, had they received dividends from a UK business rather than those in other EU companies.

"Today’s ruling effectively closes the door on any common law remedy being available for corporation tax where claims fall outside the six year time limit, which is unexpected and very disappointing," said Peter Cussons, head of EU direct tax group, at PwC.

"Claimants with claims from 23 February 2004 onwards can still file a statutory claim, but as disputes can go as far back as 1973, this potentially leaves 31 years of ineligible claims with no remedy under common law."

Historically, a UK company which received a dividend from another UK business was exempt from corporation tax on the dividend. However a dividend from a non-UK, in particular an EU, division was not exempt, but liable for corporation tax.

Bill Dodwell, tax partner at Deloitte, said: "This is an immensely complicated case and HM Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs will be pleased by the Court of Appeal’s judgement, since it limits significantly claims which may be made."

UK companies felt they were being doubly hit because they had to pay out advanced corporation tax when distributing dividends but the incoming dividends from overseas companies had no ACT paid.

This left the UK companies unable to effectively reduce the amount of ACT they had stumped up in advance of their corporation tax bill, typically due up to 9 months later.

Further reading:

Courts find for business giants in landmark Thin Cap GLO case

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities