aop
ad

Citigroup in deferred tax accounting row

by Santhie Goundar

More from this author

07 Sep 2010

Accounting experts and analysts are arguing with the US bank Citigroup over whether it should set aside $50bn (£32.5bn) to cover its deferred tax assets, the FT has reported.

The move will reportedly reduce Citigroup’s capital buffer and weaken its balance sheet. Deferred tax assets amount to more than a third of the bank’s tangible equity and are the biggest held by any US company.

So far, Citigroup has rejected calls to reserve for its deferred tax assets, saying it will earn enough in the future to support maintaining the assets on its books. The bank accumulated the deferred tax assets in part because of its huge losses during the financial crisis.

According to accounting rules Citigroup has to be confident it will earn $99bn (£64.4bn) in taxable income during the next two decades to avoid providing for its deferred tax assets. The dispute has arisen because accounting standards on deferred tax assets are vague, stating that reserves are not needed if management believes it is “more likely than not” the company will earn enough taxable income in the future. However, given that the group’s pre-tax losses exceeded $60bn (£39bn) in 2008 and 2009, coupled with Citigroup’s own assertion that it was “very comfortable with the recording of our deferred tax assets,” some have said the bank is being “too optimistic”.

Lynn Turner, a former chief accountant at the Securities and Exchange Commission, said: “Citigoup’s position defies imagination and logic. Instead of talking about making money, what Citigroup ought to do is to reserve for at least part of the deferred tax assets and reap the benefit of reducing the reserves once it actually makes money.”

However Richard Bove at Rochdale Securities said he did not believe Citigroup’s accounts were “out of order due to a misstatement of its DTAs”.

The SEC looked into Citigroup’s deferred tax assets last year and requested the bank to explain its treatment. The SEC declined to comment on whether it was still pursuing the matter.

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities