22 Apr 2010
Academics have warned IMF recommendations to establish a bailout pot by taxing banks may backfire.
Tax experts from the Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation said financial institutions were more likely to take bigger risks if there was a financial safety net in place.
In addition to a tax on profits and remuneration, banks would also pay a Financial Stability Contribution, a flat fee on their non-insured liabilities if IMF recommendations are pushed through.
"The IMF sees [the FSC] as a form of insurance premium, with the premium (that is, the tax) paid being available to governments to create a fund for future financial sector bailouts," the academics said in a briefing note.
"If bank managers, owners, or creditors believe that they are insured against future failure due to excessive risk-taking, then they are more likely to undertake riskier behaviour. That would exacerbate the likelihood of a future financial crisis."
Further reading:
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment