14 Apr 2010
New allegations of accounting trickery by collapsed US bank Lehman Brothers have emerged after the New York Times newspaper claimed the firm used a front company to conceal billions of dollars in toxic assets.
The newspaper claims company Hudson Castle played a behind-the-scenes role in helping Lehman manipulate its finances. The newspaper claims the business was staffed by ex-Lehman employees and was effectively controlled by Lehmans.
While the use of company arrangements are not uncommon, the paper said shareholders were entitled to more transparency about the relationship.
The newspaper quotes a spokesman, on behalf of Hudson, which still operates, who said the relationship with Lehman all but ended in 2004. “All funding decisions at Hudson Castle were solely made by the management team and neither the board of directors nor Lehman Brothers participated in or influenced those decisions in any way”.
Read the full story: Lehman Channeled Risks Through ‘Alter Ego’ Firm
Further reading: Lehman administrators consider damning report
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment