24 Jun 2010
Corporate insolvency regulation needs "far-reaching reforms", according to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT).
The OFT's eight-month study into the corporate insolvency regime has found that the current system fails to protect secured creditors sufficiently, and raised concerns about insolvency practitioners' (IPs') actions in certain circumstances.
An industry-funded independent complaints handling body should be introduced, with broad powers to review IP fees and actions, impose fines, and return overcharged fees to creditors.
The Insolvency Service should be repositioned as the dedicated oversight regulator of the other licensing bodies, withdrawing its role as a direct regulator of IPs, the report also recommends.
"Smooth entry and exit of firms is an important feature of a competitive economy, and while we have found that the corporate insolvency market works well in supporting this outcome in the majority of cases, unsecured creditors are insufficiently represented and protected," said Clive Maxwell, OFT senior director of services.
"Our recommendations, if enacted would benefit both the wider economy and good insolvency practitioners, without imposing burdens on the taxpayer."
More to follow.
Further reading:
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment