04 Jun 2010
One of America’s most powerful financial lobbies has attacked proposed accounting measure rules which they say injects “craziness” into financial statements.
The American Banking Association, which represents the $13 trillion US banking industry, has urged its members to fight proposed fair value rules put forward by the US accounting standard setter, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).
FASB’s proposal would force banks to measure their loans at current market prices, which banks argue would promote volatility and is not appropriate for loans held to maturity.
“This is really a jaw-dropping proposal," Donna Fisher, senior vice president of tax and accounting at the Association told CFO.com.
The international fair value model allows banks’ to measure their assets differently, depending on their purpose. Loans that are held for trading have to be measured at their market price. Loans held to their maturity date are measured at amortised cost.
According to FASB, their proposals provided more useful information to shareholders.
"The objective...is to provide financial statement users with a more timely, transparent, and representative depiction of an entity's exposure to risk from financial instruments," FASB said.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
BESTUURSADVISEUR
loans are repayable at nominal value which is compulsory laid down; so the comment is fair and realistic, only if repayment is expected to be affected a provision can seem justified
Posted by: HUBERT DE NEEF, 04 Jun 2010 | 00:00