aop
ad

Proposed rules may cost largest banks £37m each

by Mario Christodoulou

More from this author

30 Jun 2010

Proposed changes to bank accounting could cost the largest institutes almost £40m each and require a root and branch overhaul of their systems according to banks preparing to fight new proposals.

The price tag for the largest global banks, including HSBC, NatWest, RBS, Barclays, Lloyds and Santander, could be as high as £37m each according to an internal banking estimate sighted by Accountancy Age.

Banks are preparing to fight the new rules, which will affect how they anticipate and measure loans bad loans.

RBS has publicly signaled its objection, describing the changes as “unnecessarily complex, operationally challenging and [requiring] substantial systems cost” in a submission to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

The IASB wants to move from the current incurred-loss model to an expected-loss model, urged on by the G20 which is seeking to stop banks booking profits from loans they reasonably expect might not mature.

Under the current system, banks record losses if there is a “trigger” – an observable event which casts doubt on whether a loan will be honoured. A payment default is an oft-quoted example.

Under the expected-loss model banks would reassess the health of their loan portfolios each year, then downgrade profits if they “expect” a loan might not be paid.

Future cash flows would be reset and profits downgraded in line with the loan-loss expectations.

RBS believes the IASB model would be highly speculative, leading to “a higher degree of management judgment and subjectivity.”

“Therefore it is difficult to see how they will result in comparability between reporting entities,” the bank said in its submission.

Banks are proposing an alternative approach which retains some elements of the existing incurred loss model, which they argue will provide investors with information on actual losses, which will go on inform internal decisions about expected losses.

Further reading:

Banks in revolt over cost of accounting overhaul

Deloitte chief speaks out on loan-loss provisions

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities