Tweedie warns US to adopt standards or lose influence

Tweedie warns US to adopt standards or lose influence

"You are having an influence on our standards, but aren’t willing to take them yourselves," Sir David says in interview

The US could be stripped of any influence over global financial rules if it
does not adopt them itself, the head of the international accounting standard
setter has warned.

Sir David Tweedie, chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB), believes US influence on standard setting may diminish if it rejects
international accounting rules next year.

In an interview conducted earlier this year,
recently posted
online by
the Journal
of Accountancy
, Sir David said the US had a lot of influence on the creation
of accounting rules despite not actually using the rules domestically.

“One of the real dangers, if the US says no, is that there is a reaction and
[international observers] want the US influence diminished,” he said.

“You will find for example that the [US influence] on the standards will be
less, obviously, and if you decide to come in later on, you have standards that
perhaps you’re not too keen on, that you had no influence over.”

The US is still deciding whether to adopt international accounting rules. The
US standard setter, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, is attempting to
harmonise its accounting rules with international standards.

Meanwhile, the US securities regulator, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) is investigating the impact of international standards on US
markets and expects to make a final decision in next year.

Despite this, the US exerts considerable influence on standard setting. The
US has four individuals on the 15-member IASB and five trustees on the 22-member
oversight committee. SEC chairman, Mary Schapiro, also holds a seat on the
IASB’s supreme oversight body, the Monitoring Board.

Sir David said this was causing consternation among international observers.

“People are saying, ‘well, you are having an influence on our standards, but
aren’t willing to take them yourselves. Are you in or are you out?’,” he said.

“The message has been ‘do you want these standards or not and, if you don’t,
why should you have a major say in developing them’. That has really been the
underlying concern… the decision next year will change the whole atmosphere.”

Further reading:

JOA:
US Role in IFRS

The
long and winding roadmap

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource