18 Jun 2008
Ernst & Young is to return to court to face allegations it failed to detect fraud at wholesale drug distributor CBI Holding Co more than 15 years ago.
In a ruling on Monday, a US appeals court in New York reversed a lower court's decision that the company could not sue the accountancy firm for its own fraud, writes Reuters.
CBI filed for bankruptcy in 1994 after the company's managers schemed to manipulate inventory figures to inflate its chief executive's bonus and deceive lenders about its true financial condition, according to court papers. Ernst & Young had given the company clean audit opinions in 1992 and 1993.
In April 2000, the bankruptcy court ordered Ernst & Young to pay CBI's creditors about $70m (£36m) in damages, concluding the accounting firm had departed from the accepted standards of practice for auditors. Then, a US District Judge reversed that decision in favour of Ernst & Young in 2004.
But the three-judge panel on the US appeals court concluded this week that the company could sue Ernst & Young and the dispute should be sent back to the lower court for further proceedings.
Ernst & Young spokesman Charlie Perkins declined to comment on the decision
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment