aop
ad

Financial failures probed at one in five NHS bodies

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

19 Jan 2006

The number of NHS trusts examined by KPMG for poor financial management soared more than 50% above original expectations, information released to Accountancy Age has revealed.

It is now known that KPMG investigated financial problems at 81 health bodies, which is nearly a fifth of all NHS organisations, in just two weeks in December.

Turnaround teams from the firm had been widely reported to be investigating the financial management at around 50 trusts, after health secretary Patricia Hewitt revealed that NHS finances were approaching a £1bn deficit for 2005/06.

But a Freedom of Information request to the Department of Health by Accountancy Age revealed that KPMG delved into the financial affairs of 81 NHS trusts, primary care trusts and stategic health authorities over two weeks before Christmas by
undertaking ‘baseline assessments’, led by partner Alistair Groom and DoH’s Richard Gleave.

Andrew Lansley, Conservative shadow health secretary, said: ‘The scale of the problem is obviously larger than we were originally led to believe.’

Lansley also said it ‘beggars belief’ that the turnaround teams would have discovered any new information behind the financial plight of the trusts. ‘What is the point of Strategic Health Authorities if consultants are being sent in to do their job?’ he said.

He criticised the lack of information available to the public regarding trusts’ financial controls.

‘Taxpayers are footing the bill for information we should already have ­ information such as financial controls, and implementing processes for greater efficiency,’ Lansley said.

A CIMA spokeswoman said the institute had, ‘like other financial bodies known for some time of a worsening NHS financial position’, of which some had been caused by ‘poor financial management locally’.

Concerns over the mismanagement of NHS finances have been highlighted since the revelation of the extent of the deficits, which led NHS chief executive Sir Nigel Crisp to call the problem ‘unacceptable’, and ‘damaging’ to the reputation and ability of the NHS to plan.

Other organisations working with the public sector have also expressed concern. Independent think-tank the King’s Fund has called for a ‘failure regime’ to come into effect if a trust fails to either meet financial targets or achieve agreed patient care.
However, it defends some financial managers within the NHS, claiming that hospitals’ financial problems ‘are not always the result of inefficiency or financial mismanagement’.

KPMG and the DoH were unable to comment.

Visitor comments Add your comment

No time available to solve cash problems

NHS personnel never cease to amaze me. They have patience and humour in abundance but the NHS system gives them no time to help the system itself; perhaps it's time they had help and not more consultants?

During 2005, CommerceCall installed a variety of MEDICall services at NHS sites; some complex yet some extremely simple. They improved costs and working efficiencies by an average of 15% yet were only installed because NHS site staff had found time to look at their problems, listen to us and realise we had the answer they were looking for. Sadly this is rare.

Before Christmas we contacted all the CEO's of every Trust in one SHA simply to offer them the same benefits already proven in practice. Their combined savings were likely to exceed £250,000 for nil cost. The take up? NIL.

One NHS PCT subsequently said they would look to implement one of our ideas but time was short so they could, potentially, start in April. The cost of that delay will exceed that manager's salary but it's the best she could offer. Would this happen in the private sector or would they appoint consultants?

In every NHS Trust across the UK you will find, as we do, great teams of hard working managers. They do not always need consultants for their main requirement is much simpler - time to think, act and do the job they are paid for.

Posted by: Andrew Holford (MD- CommerceCall Ltd), 19 Jan 2006 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities