|
|
01 Feb 2007
The decision by the Treasury to increase the Airline Passenger Duty has been slammed by Ernst & Young as being ‘inefficient and disruptive’
Chris Sanger, head of tax policy development at Ernst & Young, said: ‘The change in the rate of APD for contracts that were concluded prior to the pre-Budget Report is a regrettable decision by the Treasury.
‘This has introduced significant market disruption, something that has been avoided in the past by providing greater advance notice (thus reducing the number of flights already booked),’ he added.
Further reading:
Ryanair CEO wants end to airline tax hikes
Brown targets air passengers to bear PBR burden
You may also like
Search thousands of financial jobs:
Search thousands of financial jobs:
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
AccountancyAgeInsight is a frequently updated resource centre for finance professionals, offering a free and easy-to-use digital library of briefings, white papers and other information resources. 
Visitor comments Add your comment