23 Nov 2004
The company says that this was caused mainly by a $4.9bn reduction owing to a change in accounting for employee benefits such as pensions.
The news came as part of a presentation to investors yesterday, but the company was quick to offer assurances that the switch will have no impact on strategy, financial framework or cashflow.
The total balance sheet hit is mitigated modestly by other standards such as IAS16 on property and plant, which brought $400,000 onto the balance sheet.
Shell also said its pension fund continues to be well funded, and that its actuarial position remained unaffected. It said its total debt will also increase by $200,000.
Shell's group financial controller, Tim Morrison, explained to analysts that the $4.9bn hit came about after the company decided to recognise marked to market pension plans under IFRS1 in the balance sheet.
Morrison said the pension funds were 'broadly in balance'.
He added that Shell would be continuing to provide support to analysts working on the changes brought by IFRS, and hoped to provide a comparative set of accounts for 2004 by April next year.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment