aop
ad

Wrapit directors loaned £150,000 before collapse

by Barbara Buchanan

14 Aug 2008

Directors of failed online wedding list company Wrapit are thought to be among the creditors of the company, having loaned it £150,000 before the company went under.

The company's latest available accounts show that the directors had loaned £450,000 the previous year, but the company said this week that those loans had been repaid in May of 2007.

Managing director Peter Gelardi added that the directors extended a further £150,000 in August 2007 to help the company over the slower autumn period, which has not been repaid.

‘[When the loans were repaid] at that point there was nothing wrong with the business. If we had wanted to reduce our exposure we wouldn’t have put in any loans,’ he said.

He added that he, together with finance director Nigel Taylor and director Nicholas Haimendorf, had also signed personal guarantees totalling £300,000.

Gelardi believes the company could have survived despite credit reference agency Graydon UK describing it as ‘technically insolvent’ for a number of years.

‘The company has a negative net worth, but it didn’t make the company insolvent.

‘At the time we were in negotiations with financiers to provide the additional funding required which we thought would be forthcoming,’ said Gelardi.

He said other financiers pulled out when HSBC, which ran Wrapit’s online credit card payments, held back on nearly £1m of funds.

The bank denied it was responsible for the company’s failure. ‘HSBC believes it has done all it can to assist the directors. Any suggestion that HSBC is responsible for Wrapit’s problems is absolutely refuted,’ said a statement.

Administrators KPMG said Wrapit’s net debts are in the region of £6.5m. HSBC is owed £3.2m.

Visitor comments Add your comment

Banks Never Accept any Responsibility for Their Actions

What a surprise. Another company forced out of business by a bank. And as usual, it is allegedly the responsibility of the Directors who are at the mercy of the banks and governement economic policy. The government squeezes the incompetent banks and they squeeze their customers. We faced the same situation 20 years ago and the outcome was the same - everyone looses except the banks and their advisers.

Posted by: Anon, 14 Aug 2008 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities