aop
ad

Accounts qualified in five government departments

by our parliamentary correspondent

21 Jul 2009

The day before parliament is due to go on its summer break it has been revealed the accounts for five Whitehall departments have been qualified by the National Audit Office.

The new head of the NAO, Amyas Morse, has even told the Treasury and HM Revenue and Customs that their accounts are not up to standard.

Accounts from the department of work and pensions, defence and the Equalities Commission were also qualified in reports slipped out amid a deluge of paperwork from Whitehall.

Morse said he declined to sign off the Treasury's resource accounts for 2008/09 because the department incurred £24bn more expenditure than Parliament authorised, arising from losses from the operation of the Asset Protection Scheme.

Morse also reported the Treasury's balance sheet showed the net of total assets, less liabilities, now stand at £44bn – up £2bn on 2007/08.

The NAO qualified the accounts of the DWP for the 20th consecutive year because they showed a net £2.7bn loss in fraud and error across all benefits except the state pension.

And Revenue and Customs' were subject to error and fraud in the tax credit system

totaling between £1.58bn and £1.84bn (up on the £1.31bn to £1.54bn in 2006/07).

Morse said he qualified the MoD's accounts because of a ‘net error’ of £140m in the amount a new computer system that allows servicemen and women to enter expense claims without further checks. There was missing radio and computer equipment worth £155m and a ‘significant risk of error’ over £14.1bn in raw materials and spares.

The Equality Commission’s accounts were qualified because £629,000 was spent paying consultancy fees to former staff whose departure terms excluded being rehired.

Morse said the financial year had been ‘an extraordinary one’ for the Treasury, and appeared to accept that the need to intervene to prevent a financial markets meltdown with the Asset Protection Scheme prevented it from seeking the necessary additional resources from Parliament.

A Treasury spokesman said: ‘The NAO has acknowledged that the need to act by introducing the Asset Protection Scheme did not allow time to seek Parliamentary approval for the accounting consequences of the scheme, which resulted in a technical qualification of the accounts.

‘In-principle, agreements were not reached with the participating banks until after the final supplementary estimates were laid with Parliament in February.’

But Liberal Democrat shadow chancellor Vince Cable said the NAO's concerns were ‘entirely legitimate’ and claimed: ‘The Asset Protection Scheme is quite simply a massive fraud on the taxpayer, providing insurance for 'bad' loans but with a huge, open-ended risk.’

The qualified accounts were not drawn attention to as a piece but spread unevenly amid an raft of government documents on other matters.

The MoD issued its own press release stressing the high priority it gave to success on operations and quoted new defence secretary Bob Ainsworth praising the ‘bravery, professionalism and dedication’ of the armed forces. It ignored the qualification.

A later report from the Commons Public Accounts Committee slated HMRC for failing to maintain physical checks on goods entering the UK, while evidence showed non-compliance over paperwork among traders had increased.

PAC chairman Edward Leigh said: ‘It is far from reassuring to learn that the department's management of customs activities is fragmented and disjointed, that accountabilities are blurred and that management information is poor.’

A Treasury statement also revealed that £5bn has been set aside for claims of over paid VAT based on a legal ruling last year involving Michael Fleming, an Aston Martin dealer, and Conde Nast the publishing group. During the case, law lords ruled the taxman had acted illegally when in 1997 when it ruled that people only had three years to claim for overpaid VAT.

Further reading:

View the MOD report

View the HMRC report

View the Treasury report

View the DWP report

View the Equality and Human Rights Commission's report

Visitor comments Add your comment

So what!?

Are there any repercussions as a result of government departments having qualified accounts? It's not like their share prices is going to be affected.

If the DWP's accounts can be qualified 20 years in a row, then what is the point of even bothering to audit them? It really begs the question "What's the point of the NAO?". Perhaps government should cut costs there instead.

Posted by: Slightly miffed of St. Albans, 21 Jul 2009 | 00:00

Qualified accounts

So the MOD has introduced a new computerised system so that servicemen and women can enter expense claims without further checks.

Will they too be allowed to charge second home allowances?

Posted by: John S, 23 Jul 2009 | 00:00

shocking

Simply shocking that UK businesses are under so much scrutiny by HMRC - and yet our own Government appears to be incapable of running their own departments.

Posted by: Lena Ahad, 14 Aug 2009 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities