18 Jan 2001
The institute found last year Grant Thornton had no case to answer over allegations of professional misconduct made by former Heritage chairman Jeff Lampert.
Lampert's allegations centering around claims of conflicts of interest and his assertion that he had not received a vital report from the firm.
The institute said this week it was assessing new evidence from Lampert and his MP Rudi Vis. The pair's campaign has also received a boost after John Moore, until recently chief examiner at the DTI's Insolvency Service, told Lampert in a letter: 'There are some issues arising from this which I would wish to take up with the institute from all this.'
Concerns were raised over the issue of whether or not Lampert received the report.
Moore emphasised he does not regard the institute's decision as unreasonable and that the matters are of 'general application for the future.'
Grant Thornton declined to comment, while the institute emphasised the Insolvency Service's conclusion was not critical of its decision in the case.
Links
Curbs urged on 'trigger happy' receivers
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment