aop
ad

Big four control directly linked to higher audit fees

by AccountancyAge.com

29 Apr 2008

Research commissioned by BDO Stoy Hayward and conducted by London School of Economics reveals audit fees are certain to escalate should one of the big four firms exit the audit market, leaving only the big three in control.

The report demonstrates the reduction from big five to big four firms in 2002, following the collapse of Arthur Andersen, fuelled a 2.4% jump in the average audit fees paid by listed companies, excluding other factors such as changes in regulation. Audit fee growth has continued every year since then.

The research also shows that a drop of just 10 percentage points in the market share the big four hold at present could lead to the annual audit fees paid by UK’s listed and private companies easing by 7%.

Currently, all FTSE-100 companies are audited by one of the big four and 3% of FTSE-350 companies are audited by other firms.

‘This research reveals there is a real cost of high market concentration among auditors, and that the current market structure needs to change,’ Jeremy Newman, BDO Stoy Hayward LLP managing partner, said. ‘It also highlights the potential impact of another firm leaving the marketplace and the need to act now to mitigate this.

‘At present, the audit market is not adequately prepared to cope with the departure of another major firm from the marketplace and this must be a cause for concern for all those involved in this industry – the accountancy profession, investors, regulators and listed companies alike.’

Newman suspected that, if data were available, a similar issue would emerge relating to the non-audit services.

Dr Mariano Selvaggi, researcher at LSE, said previous studies had looked at the relationship between market concentration and audit fees, but the latest research raised new concerns about the current structure of auditing services.

‘Our findings have important implications for the future evolution of the UK audit market,’ he said.

Further reading

Peer blasts audit guidance proposals

Visitor comments Add your comment

Surprised .... NOT

So a report commissioned by an non big 3 firm BDO Stoy Hayward suggests their larger "competitors" (I use the term in its widest sense) are responsible for "higher" audit fees.

Does "higher" mean "uncompetitive"?

What about the frequent "low balling" allegations on audit fees in order to profit gouge from tax avoidance and "management consultancy" advice which so frequently give rise to material conflicts of interest and mediocre performance at best?

Other than to support the broad principle that competition can be good for the consumer, this is palpable pap

Posted by: Drew Edgar, 29 Apr 2008 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities