06 Oct 2008
Analysts have said that the possiblity of fair value being dropped in one part of the world while it still operates in another is 'stupid.'
The move has been ruled out in Europe for now, but might still happen in the US. The prospect of having a suspension in fair value in one jurisdiction while it still operates in another would cause serious comparability problems for end-users.
'Would you have [mark- to market suspended] just in the US, just in the UK, or just in my office? There would be no comparability.' said Peter Elwin head of accounting and valuation research at Cazenove Equities. 'How stupid is that?'
His comments were made at PricewaterhouseCoopers' Meet the Experts event in London, which also heard from Bob Herz, chairman of FASB.
'Suspending fair value is completely the wrong thing to do,'added Elwin.
Sarah Deans of JP Morgan called for fair value rules to be toughened not relaxed. The chartered accountant said: ' We should have more fair value for financial instruments not less. I am very alarmed at the proposals. I would rather have fair value than what someone thinks or hopes what something might be worth.'
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment