18 Feb 2009
The Guardian’s £800,000 bill for legal costs incurred during its dispute with Tesco included £87,000 paid to Ernst & Young, Accountancy Age has learned.
The newspaper was forced to apologise last September after accusing the supermarket of creating an elaborate off-shore structure to avoid paying up to £1bn in corporation tax on profits from the sale of its UK properties.
Headlines included ‘Tesco’s £1bn tax avoiding plan move to the Cayman Islands’ and ‘Every little bit helps: tax free pot of gold at end of Tesco’s rainbow’.
The Guardian subsequently accepted the ‘damaging allegations were unfounded’.
Editor Alan Rusbridger said this week: ‘It was Tesco’s contention that The Guardian had made an elementary and obvious mistake. So simple was it that the bill includes more than £350k for their tax lawyers and accountants to explain to their own lawyers just what Tesco were up to.’
Tesco media director Jonathan Church said: ‘The Guardian got their story on Tesco and tax completely wrong. They have agreed to pay costs and we are now discussing the amounts with them through the courts.’ Ernst & Young declined to comment.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment