aop
ad

Treasury withholds non-dom facts

by Alex Hawkes

10 Jan 2008

The Treasury has refused to reveal when it first proposed its £30,000 charge on residents non-domiciled, amid claims that the government stole the policy from the Tory party.

Despite boasting in response to a similar request that it had been working on proposals for an overhaul of inheritance tax before the Tories had, the government turned down similar questions on the non-dom policies.

At their October party conference, the Tories outlined a £25,000 charge for non-doms to pay for raising the IHT threshold to £1m. Alistair Darling then announced IHT changes and a £30,000 charge for non-doms the next week.

‘You have asked for information on the timing of when particular stages in the formulation or development of a policy measure occurred, and the titles of documents. Our information is not recorded in that way as a readily available series of discreet information,’ the Treasury response to Accountancy Age’s Freedom of Information request said.

When The Daily Telegraph asked about the government’s IHT changes, it revealed it had been working on them as early as January, and published its response to the request on its website.

Tory shadow chief secretary to the treasury Philip Hammond said: ‘When it suited Gordon Brown, the Treasury responded to an FOI request on the origins of their Inheritance Tax policy with amazing speed. Those documents showed that the IHT idea was only advanced by government after the Conservatives raised it.

‘People will draw their own conclusions about where Labour got the non-doms idea from.’

Visitor comments Add your comment

Another new labour mess.

ILL CONCEIVED, DEVIOUS AND UNFAIR ATTACK ON NON-DOMS. Those who have a modest pension from abroad and who have planned their retirement and family assitance are now being kept in the dark by the government and are under threat of drastic disruption to their lives. The dishonesty of this government knows no limits and the withholding of the planned new penalties is a new and disgusting attack on many who were invited here to work and have settled here with their children. It is difficult to find words which do justice to the chancellor's stupidity and unfair behavior, based on collusion with Brown who is destroying the honour, decency and honesty for which Britain was once well known. It is a disgrace.

Posted by: d.tolhurst, 11 Feb 2008 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities