06 Sep 2004
In its annual report, the Commission claims to be slowly winning the battle, saying there was a reduction of 20% to €482m euros in financial 'irregularities' in 2003.
But, recognising that this is still 'unacceptable', it blames the member states.
National authorities do not notify irregularities on a sufficiently consistent basis 'and their efforts to safeguard the Communities financial interests and claw-back funds are not always adequate,' said Brussels.
The thrust of the anti-fraud action plan for 2004/2005 is administrative collaboration between Brussels and the member states covering trans-national VAT fraud of €500,000 or more, money laundering, and EU budget swindles of €100,000 or more.
The national anti-fraud authorities will be required to conduct surveillance operations, speed up responses to requests by introducing 6-week time limits and set up a VAT information system so that the commission can provide evidence in administrative or judicial proceedings and draw up intelligence reports.
The worst country for fraud last year was Belgium, with a reported 470 cases, followed by the UK with 336 and Germany with 300.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment