13 Nov 2007
The European Court of Auditors has failed to give a statement of assurance on much of the European Commission's spending - for the 13th time.
The auditors' report, covering the 2006 budget, cites spending 'irregularities' and a lack of supervision by the European Commission as reasons for its decision. The issues are mostly with agricultural and redistibutional spending.
According to the ECA, the Commission has not managed to maintain effective supervision of expenditure on major infrastructure projects, as nearly 80% of the EU's 106bn euro (£75bn) budget failed the auditors' test.
This news comes despite hopes expressed by Brian Gray, the EC’s accounting officer, in an interview with Accountancy Age that his books would be given a clean bill of health.
The ECA's criticisms come in the wake of EC mandarins slating member states for audit shortcomings.
The EC has the remit for the handling of the budget, but member states are responsible for distributing the bulk of EU spending, mostly in grants and subsidies.
Further reading:
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment