10 Feb 2004
The Revenue released draft and secondary legislation last week outlining its plans to penalise construction companies that employ contractors who are not actually self-employed.
'[The legislation] gives a lot of additional responsibilities to construction companies, and introduces new [fixed financial] penalties against those that don?t comply,' said Alastair Kendrick, director of tax at Ernst & Young.
He described the legislation as a 'minefield' and said that a construction firm has to be satisfied any contractor it employs is a self-employed worker.
'If the Revenue believes the contractor to be employed then the company is liable for a penalty. The problem is that determining whether the person is employed or self-employed is not easy.'
He went on to say that the Revenue is 'washing its hands of all policing of the scheme and passing the responsibility on to the companies'.
The legislation will come into force in April 2006 with Kendrick saying smaller firms will be hit the hardest.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment