28 Oct 2005
Over a dozen British companies paid kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's regime as part of the United Nations' Oil for Food programme, the independent inquiry into the scandal has found.
GlaxoSmithKline is one of 14 British companies to face allegations from Paul Volcker, who led the investigation, with two subsidiaries of the blue-chip pharmaceuticals company implicated.
Glaxo Smithkline Walls House is alleged to have paid $834,390 (£468,000) in kickbacks to secure $9.1m worth of business selling ‘drugs, medicine, purinethol’; while Glaxo Wellcome Export Ltd is accused of paying $257,596 for $2.8m worth of medicines contracts.
The companies did not comment to Volcker’s investigators.
Oil company Sinochem International Oil London Co is also alleged to have paid a $6m surcharge and Marbel Resources Ltd $3m.
The Volcker committee said Iraq generally demanded kickbacks of around 10%. These payments 'were disguised by various subterfuges' not disclosed 'by Iraq or the participating contractors.'
The bribes netted Iraq’s former regime more than $1.5bn prior to being toppled in the US-led 2003 invasion. In all, 2,200 companies are accused of making illicit payments.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment